The State of the Industry · 2026-Q3 · NZ

New Zealand dental practices earn glowing reviews but stay largely invisible in search, and most are sliding backwards

Across 115 New Zealand dental practices assessed this quarter, reputations are strong yet reach is thin. The cohort holds a median rating of 4.8 and 96 reviews, but a median digital score of 46.1 and just 2.6 per cent reaching the Accomplished tier point to widespread underperformance online.

RADAR score distribution · 115 businesses2026-Q3
MEDIAN · 46.1
0255075100
The numbers that define the industry
4.8★
Median Google rating
96
Median reviews — top quartile starts at 190
63.7%
Attract under 100 organic visits/month
2.6%
Reach Accomplished — the top tier
Tier distribution
29
55
28
3
Off the radar (0–34) · 25.2% Emerging (35–54) · 47.8% Established (55–74) · 24.3% Accomplished (75+) · 2.6%
Findings from the sweep
Finding 01 · Review and reputation paradox

Strong ratings mask fragile digital foundations

The cohort posts a median rating of 4.8 and a median 96 reviews, with the top quartile clearing 190. Yet only 4.4 per cent of practices convert that reputation into broader digital strength, showing that goodwill on review platforms is not translating into visibility or performance elsewhere.

Finding 02 · Search invisibility

Nearly half the cohort barely registers in search

Around 46 per cent of practices are effectively invisible in search, and 63.7 per cent sit in the low-traffic band based on third-party estimates. A median domain authority of just 10 helps explain why so many reputable practices are hard to find when patients look online.

Finding 03 · Growth versus decline

Decliners outnumber growers by nearly two to one

Only 35.1 per cent of practices are growing while 63.5 per cent are in decline, and 12 have collapsed outright. The divergence suggests momentum is concentrated in a minority, with the majority losing ground quarter on quarter.

Finding 04 · Website and conversion weakness

Weak sites undercut otherwise trusted practices

With 43.5 per cent of the cohort in the digital bottom tier and a median score of 46.1, website and conversion performance is a clear drag. The prevalence of WordPress, Wix and undetected platforms among top setups points to inconsistent build quality across the field.

Region by region
RegionBusinessesMedian RADARAccomplished
WKO7 60.2
NSW1 50.6
CAN12 48
2
WGN16 48
BOP5 46.6
AUK43 43.9
1
OTA3 37.8

Smaller cohorts shown for indication only.

Technology landscape
WordPress
60.9%
Other / none detected
22.6%
Wix
6.1%
Squarespace
5.2%
Webflow
1.7%
METHODOLOGY — RADAR scores five pillars (Reputation, Authority, Digital experience, Activity, Reach) from verified public data across the 2026-Q3 Dental cohort (115 businesses, NZ). Figures are aggregated and anonymised; individual business data is never disclosed. Search metrics are third-party estimates shown as approximations. RADARREGISTER.COM · AN INITIATIVE OF REDFOX DIGITAL.